Political Quotes

On the recordDecember 28, 2012
Mr. President, I rise in support of amendment No. 3410, which would take the spending for Sandy relief and spend only 1 year at a time and would offset that spending with spending cuts. Now, you ask, why would we want to do that? Well, if you have been watching Congress in recent years, you might understand that we are not very good with money up here. Each year we are spending $1 trillion that we do not have. To me, there is absolutely no objective evidence that we are very good with money up here, so you do not want to give Congress 3 years' worth of spending authority on Hurricane Sandy. Why don't we do it 1 year at a time and make sure there is correct oversight and make sure the money is not being wasted, make sure the money is not being abused. I will give a couple of examples of what is in the current bill. We have money for Alaskan fisheries in the Hurricane Sandy bill. They tried earlier today to stuff money in here for a country by the name of Palau in the western part of the Pacific. Now, I thought this was about emergency relief for Hurricane Sandy, which hit the northeast coast. What does that have to do with sending money to the far reaches of the Earth, including sending money to work on Alaskan fisheries? If you want to give money to Alaskan fisheries, have a bill on the floor about Alaskan fisheries, but do not pretend that we are going to stuff it in some emergency bill for the Northeast.…
Said by
Rand Paul
Republican · Kentucky

Share & report

More from Rand Paul

Jul 15, 2025

Like, the whole wearing cloth masks over you, in all likelihood, people in America died because they took his advice.

breitbart.com
Sep 7, 2025

All the doubt over vaccines is – there might be some doubt coming from those who don't want you to take a vaccine, but quite a bit of doubt is coming from the establishment that I believe is authoritarian in nature.

cbsnews.com
Jul 24, 2025

I think there is enough evidence in here that he lied to Congress about the dossier.

breitbart.com
Jul 15, 2025

No, and I think he is probably not criminally liable for saying stuff that made no scientific sense.

breitbart.com

Other voices in this conversation