I want to yield again to my colleague from Wisconsin, but one of the things that intrigued me earlier was the notion that somehow we were not interested in security, that we were not interested in fighting the most effective fight that we could against 9/11, and that we were playing politics with the security of this country. That seems to me to be kind of standard rhetoric when we are talking about these matters, when in fact we tend not to deal with what is in the actual law, what the facts of the situation are. I would like to yield again to my colleague from Wisconsin. We have been joined by another distinguished colleague, Mr. Perlmutter, from Colorado. I would like you all to engage in a colloquy about the issue of politics and just who might be playing politics with a very important matter of national security.
John Yarmuth: “I want to yield again to my colleague from Wisconsin, but one of the things that intrigued me earlier was the notion…”
On the recordMarch 5, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing national security and the political discourse surrounding the fight against terrorism.
Share
More from John Yarmuth
Jul 19, 2022
We did not commit child abuse. That is an absurd statement. Forgive me, Speaker Gingrich.
Aug 12, 2022
I want to respond one more time to these claims about 87,000 new IRS agents. The IRS has never made any announcement about plans to hire any number of agents. The Washington Post fact-checker has actually given that claim three Pinocchios…
Aug 12, 2022
I just want to clarify one thing. It seems to me that Republicans just don't want people to pay taxes even if they are owed. We know there are hundreds of billions of dollars of owed-but-not-paid taxes in this country every year. This is…





