Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 18, 2011
Mr. Chairman, the amendments propose a net increase in budget authority in the bill. The amendments are not in order under section 3(j)(3) of House Resolution 5, 112th Congress which states, ``It shall not be in order to consider an amendment to a general appropriations bill proposing a net increase in budget authority in the bill unless considered en bloc with another amendment or amendments proposing an equal or greater decrease of such budget authority pursuant to clause 2(f) of rule XXI.'' The amendments propose a net increase in budget authority in the bill in violation of such section. I ask for a ruling. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Kentucky makes a point of order that the amendments offered en bloc by the gentlewoman from Ohio violate section 3(j)(3) of House Resolution 5. Does any Member wish to be heard on the point of order? The gentlewoman from Ohio is recognized.
Said by
Hal Rogers
Republican · Kentucky

Share & report

More from Hal Rogers

Nov 14, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman for yielding me this time. I rise today in strong support of the continuing resolution. With government funding set to expire on Friday, this legislation is necessary to ensure we avoid a harmful…

govinfo.gov
Jul 28, 2021

Mr. Speaker, I claim time in support of the amendments, and I yield myself such time as I may consume. This amendments en bloc contains a number of good proposals by both sides of the aisle. I want to highlight just a few. It includes…

govinfo.gov
Jun 13, 2019

Mr. Chairman, this amendment would ensure that veteran- and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses are able to effectively compete for State Department contracts and grants. We have a moral obligation to help our veterans, and…

govinfo.gov
Jul 28, 2021

Madam Speaker, I urge a ``yes'' vote on this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. {time} 1515

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation