Political Quotes

On the recordDecember 8, 2011
While I have a great deal of respect and admiration for the gentleman from Illinois, I am going to oppose this amendment. I would say, first of all, that this legislation does not change in any way the current EPA standard relating to particulate matter on coarse materials. His amendment would strike the provision in the bill addressing nuisance dust, keeping only that which prohibits a change to the existing PM10 standard for 1 year, which we agree with. But because it strikes section 3, which is the main part and the substantive part of this bill because it would eliminate our nuisance dust definition, I would respectfully oppose the amendment and urge all Members to vote ``no'' on the amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Rush). The question was taken; and the Chair announced that the noes appeared to have it.
Said by
Ed Whitfield
Republican · Kentucky

Share

More from Ed Whitfield

Jun 21, 2016

As I see it, the RFS was enacted largely for three reasons--to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil, to lower greenhouse gas emissions, and to strengthen rural economies.

congress.gov
Jul 5, 2016

There are strong feelings on the issue because many people, and we are speaking for our constituents, believe that EPA is exceeding its legal authority under the direction of a president who is trying to impose his will on climate change…

congress.gov
Jun 8, 2016

May I ask how much time is remaining on both sides? The CHAIR. The gentleman from Kentucky has 20 minutes remaining. The gentleman from Illinois has 13\1/2\ minutes remaining.

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2016

This subcommittee has cast a critical eye on several major regulations--such as the ozone rule and the Clean Power Plan--that threaten billions of dollars in costs and thousands of jobs.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation