Political Quotes

On the recordOctober 5, 2011
I rise in opposition to this amendment for a couple of reasons. Number one, because EPA has already comprehensively and exhaustively examined the health benefits cost and every other analysis relating to their regulations. We have voluminous information about those benefits. I would also say that we've heard testimony after testimony from experts who say that you cannot in any way with certainty say how many lives are going to be saved, how many people are not going to be put in the hospital, how many cases of asthma are going to be not contracted because of passing a regulation or not passing a regulation. They have models. They come up with estimates, and there's not anything in this amendment that would provide any more certainty. And for that reason, I oppose the amendment and ask that it be defeated. I yield back the balance of my time.
Said by
Ed Whitfield
Republican · Kentucky

Share & report

More from Ed Whitfield

Mar 15, 2016

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and to include extraneous material on the bill, H.R. 3797. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of…

Congressional Record · 2016-03-15
Apr 13, 2016

We face these consequences despite having the toughest air regulations on stationary sources, the toughest air regulations on farms and dairies...

congress.gov
Mar 15, 2016

Mr. Chairman, I do rise in opposition to this amendment. This amendment would require a GAO report detailing an increase, if any, in sulfur dioxide and other emissions and the effect of implementing the legislation on public health. Now…

Congressional Record · 2016-03-15
Apr 13, 2016

the Clean Air Act needed to be revisited.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation