I want to thank Mr. Upton for his work on the 21st Century Cures Act, finally making medical breakthroughs a national priority. With this bill, we will extend the longevity and improve the lives of millions of Americans now and in the future. And in the process, we will dramatically reduce the taxpayer money we spend to treat sick Americans. With all that in mind, I want to highlight an amendment that my thoughtful and hard-working colleague, Dr. Harris of Maryland, and I have worked on, and I urge my colleagues' support. This amendment would create within NIH a structure for a medical prize program. The United States is currently spending $632 billion per year through just one program, Medicare, to cover health services of qualified beneficiaries. To help lower taxpayer costs as well as improve patient outcomes, this amendment will offer modest monetary rewards to those outside of government who can develop significant medical breakthroughs. The medical prize program will encourage scientists and entrepreneurs, especially those that don't typically receive NIH grants, to develop cost-saving, life-improving cures for some of the most debilitating diseases that afflict our young and old. With those thoughts in mind, I urge your support of the amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Todd Young: “I want to thank Mr. Upton for his work on the 21st Century Cures Act, finally making medical breakthroughs a national…”
Share
More from Todd Young
Without an industrious, innovative, and self-sustaining domestic biotechnology sector, the United States will remain at risk—both of relying on China for new, life-saving therapies and basic drugs, and of being unprepared for the next…
If we want small businesses to succeed in the long term, we also need to ensure that entrepreneurs have access to capital, a skilled workforce, and a regulatory environment that supports innovation and growth.
As we look ahead to the next 250 years, they will remain just as essential to America’s success.
One could imagine this issue being broadly bipartisan as well at a time when people rightly question whether there are just basic good government measures that we can take across party lines that majorities can agree to.





