There are First Amendment implications to requiring to call someone by their preferred pronoun or not.
Todd Rokita: “There are First Amendment implications to requiring to call someone by their preferred pronoun or not.”
Editor's note · Context
Rokita highlights First Amendment concerns regarding pronoun usage.
Share
More from Todd Rokita
They are designed to reduce compulsive use, mitigate risks of anxiety, depression, disordered eating, sleep disruption, and other documented harms, and give parents greater ability to supervise their children’s online activity.
The First Amendment does not disappear because someone holds a law license or is in an elected office.
We know every penny matters right now and are committed to making sure you are treated fairly at the pump during this time.
The IHSAA exists to build character. A racial litmus test for choosing leadership on the IHSAA’s board does the opposite, and after months of delay, the Association left us no choice but to take legal action.





