I oppose his amendment. While the amendment would merely state that it is U.S. policy to continue to support implementation of the Security Council resolution that was passed in June 1998 in response to the nuclear weapons tests in South Asia--a resolution we voted for--I believe the amendment casts us back to a very different time, well before the miraculous changes in India's relations with the United States and with the world that occurred as a result of the July 2005 Joint Statement and India's decision to turn the corner on nonproliferation policy generally. I do not believe this bill is the right place to address ourselves to the past. This bill is about the future. We have taken adequate account in the bill of the concerns the Senator's amendment would address. Section 1033 of the Lugar-Biden bill makes it the policy of the United States that: India remains in full compliance with its non- proliferation, arms control, and disarmament agreements, obligations, and commitments.
Dick Lugar: “I oppose his amendment. While the amendment would merely state that it is U.S. policy to continue to support…”
On the recordNovember 16, 2006
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to U.S. policy on nonproliferation and India's nuclear relations.
Share
More from Dick Lugar
Feb 25, 2019
Well, in addition to the comments that have been made about better cohesion with our European allies, it seems to me we need to be thinking more about missile defense than about really the ways in which we negate the value of these…
Feb 25, 2019
I believe that the verification provisions of New START are important, to begin with, leaving aside anything else.
Dec 5, 2012
on behalf of myself as ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Senator James Inhofe, the ranking member of the East Asia and Pacific Subcommittee, I rise today to commemorate the 85th birthday anniversary of His…





