I did not object to the Ford sense-of-the-Senate amendment to S. 1061. I agree with its sentiment that the needs of tobacco farmers should be taken into account when Congress considers the proposed tobacco settlement. I wish to express reservations about two points in the Ford amendment's language. First, the amendment says that any compensation to tobacco growers should ``be included within the $368.5 billion in payments.'' However, we do not now know that the size of the settlement will be precisely $368.5 billion. It may be larger. Moreover, payments to growers might be additive to the settlement amount, whatever its size. Second, the amendment expresses a desire to ensure ``the continued administration of a viable federal tobacco program which operates at no net cost to the taxpayer.'' I favor compensating tobacco farmers for the equity they have built up in the quota system over the years. Such a buyout of the quota program should lead to, at most, a minimal price-supporting role for the Government. That is what we have done for the producers of most other commodities in the 1996 FAIR Act: Transition payments, and price supports at market-clearing levels. I believe that to continue the present tobacco program without change is not likely to be viable, so I find the amendment's language acceptable.
Dick Lugar: “I did not object to the Ford sense-of-the-Senate amendment to S. 1061. I agree with its sentiment that the needs of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Ford amendment related to tobacco farmers during Senate debate on tobacco settlement.
Share
More from Dick Lugar
I rise to introduce the Liquefied Natural Gas, LNG, for NATO Act. The United States is in possession of vast resources that could directly contribute to the energy security of our closest NATO allies, who face over-reliance on Russian and…
Well, in addition to the comments that have been made about better cohesion with our European allies, it seems to me we need to be thinking more about missile defense than about really the ways in which we negate the value of these…
I rise today to address my colleagues on a number of issues important to the future of the United States and to offer some perspective on Senate service. In a few weeks, I will leave the Senate for new pursuits that will allow me to devote…
on behalf of myself as ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Senator James Inhofe, the ranking member of the East Asia and Pacific Subcommittee, I rise today to commemorate the 85th birthday anniversary of His…





