our public assistance programs should encourage work, not dependency. The Senator from North Carolina and I agree on this. However, this amendment affects the wrong people. It would deny food stamps to able-bodied 18- to 55-year-old persons without dependents unless they work at least part time. Many people who fit that description are not long-term food stamp recipients. Individuals who have long job histories but who are laid off when a factory closes would be denied benefits under this amendment. This result should concern all of us. Individuals who have never been on the Food Stamp Program and who have always worked are exactly the kinds of people that the Food Stamp Program should help--people who face a temporary setback. Individuals who have been laid off when a factory closes may face high local unemployment and may find it difficult to get a job. The case of the people I have described is not unusual. Over half of all food stamp recipients will only stay on for a matter of months, and they will most likely leave because their earnings increase. A major goal of the Agriculture Committee was to preserve a safety net for people who have played by the rules and need a helping hand through hard times, while ending the free ride for those categories of recipients who have most taken advantage of the system.
On the recordSeptember 11, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of an amendment on food stamp eligibility during a debate on public assistance programs.
Share
More from Dick Lugar
Nov 27, 2012
I suggest the absence of a quorum. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. Shaheen). The clerk will call the roll. The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Iowa.
Feb 25, 2019
Several members of Congress have already proposed legislation along these lines.
Feb 25, 2019
The President has to want to get back into the discussions. At this point, there is not evidence that that is the case.
Feb 25, 2019
Congress, via the power of the purse, also has the ability to prevent the administration from taking steps, such as testing and fielding new and unnecessary land-based intermediate-range missile systems.





