I will oppose the amendment because I believe that, in fact, the Senator's objectives are being realized in many ways. Some are known to the Senator; some I would like to discuss presently. But, first of all, I would say that in arguing in favor of the Moscow Treaty, Senator Biden and I have pointed out that the President had already made a determination that we were going to unilaterally destroy a good number of weapons. And the Russians, for their own reasons, had decided they wanted to do so. This is why it is a very short and simple treaty without extensive verification protocols that have characterized other treaties. But it comes with the START I verification procedures that last through 2009. In our hearings, we have pointed out 2009 is short of 2012, which is the timetable for the total treaty to be consummated. But, at the same time, there is all of the strictness the Senator from Illinois has mentioned in previous treaties incorporated in this one.
Dick Lugar: “I will oppose the amendment because I believe that, in fact, the Senator's objectives are being realized in many ways.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Moscow Treaty and its verification protocols during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Dick Lugar
I believe that the verification provisions of New START are important, to begin with, leaving aside anything else.
I suggest the absence of a quorum. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. Shaheen). The clerk will call the roll. The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Iowa.
I am very grateful to have had this opportunity to serve with each one of you.
I rise to introduce the Liquefied Natural Gas, LNG, for NATO Act. The United States is in possession of vast resources that could directly contribute to the energy security of our closest NATO allies, who face over-reliance on Russian and…





