First of all I would point out that the funds that are provided are at this year's fiscal level. It is not a cut. It is a cut from the President's request. The other observation I would make is I believe that the Department should be in the business of science research and development and not exclusively be paying for companies to license new reactors, so that would certainly do justification.
Peter Visclosky: “First of all I would point out that the funds that are provided are at this year's fiscal level. It is not a cut. It is…”
On the recordJune 19, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing funding levels and priorities for the Department of Energy.
Share
More from Peter Visclosky
Feb 5, 2020
I must also stress my concern that the administration has not demonstrated the same commitment when it comes to arms control.
Feb 5, 2020
Who makes a decision to dispose of property like that when you have a backlog for people who are working in the military who need housing that is affordable?
Dec 17, 2019
I thank the chairwoman for yielding. I would like to begin by expressing my appreciation to Ranking Member Calvert. Mr. Calvert continues to be a tremendous partner in this process, and he is a joy to work with. I would also like to…
Feb 5, 2020
And my humble request here today is that we take that next step, continue to support it more robustly.





