Mr. Chairman, I rise not to object to the Boehlert amendment. I will not do so, but I do think it is imperative that the House understand the situation relative to funding for the Army Corps of Engineers. A year ago on this floor, in considering the bill, we had several very serious controversies relative to wetland regulation. When the budget was sent to the United States Congress in January of this year, those rules were not yet in effect. Subsequent to that period of time, they went into effect, and the Army Corps of Engineers has estimated that the additional cost to ensure that there is no delay to developers and contractors and members of the general public would be 6 million additional dollars over and above the budget request. Those $6 million are not contained in this bill.
Peter Visclosky: “Mr. Chairman, I rise not to object to the Boehlert amendment. I will not do so, but I do think it is imperative that the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding issues for the Army Corps of Engineers during House floor debate.
Share
More from Peter Visclosky
We will talk today about training, equipment, and resources needed to give our soldiers the skills and tools needed to accomplish their missions.
It is clear that they seek to increase their influence in the region and, indeed, the world.
I deeply appreciate Mr. Rush yielding time to me. I also thank him for organizing this Special Order. I thank my colleague from Chicago, Mr. Davis, for participating, and earlier today, Andre Carson, a Member from Indianapolis, for also…
I want to thank the chairwoman for her very kind remarks. I also want to thank Nita for her friendship over the years. As I am going to again mention in my prepared remarks, the gentlewoman's life of service to not only her constituency…





