I would point out that there was a $70 million increase, and I would not want to engage in quibbling as to whether it is a second, third or fourth generation, but do believe there is a strong public purpose for demonstrating the commercial viability of the thermal-neutron gas reactor for the very purposes that the gentleman is concerned about and that I share his concern, that is, climate change and global warming and energy sources, where we can generate the electricity in this country as well as potentially produce hydrogen. We ought to start down that road sooner rather than later, and again in a balanced fashion along with 2010.
Peter Visclosky: “I would point out that there was a $70 million increase, and I would not want to engage in quibbling as to whether it is…”
On the recordJune 19, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing funding for thermal-neutron gas reactor technology and its implications for climate change and energy sources.
Share
More from Peter Visclosky
Sep 22, 2020
I see Ms. Granger, who is the ranking member on the full committee, might be seeking recognition, so I reserve the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Without objection, the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Granger) will now control…
Feb 26, 2020
my reason for submitting this testimony is to discuss the vital importance of preserving and promoting Section 219 Environmental Infrastructure authority...
Feb 5, 2020
It is clear that they seek to increase their influence in the region and, indeed, the world.





