In closing, I would again point out that in 2009, Congress ratified this settlement to end 18 years of litigation. I do not think we should adopt the amendment and potentially begin another 18 years of litigation and would ask my colleagues to oppose the amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California (Mr. Denham). The amendment was agreed to. Amendment Offered by Mr. Scalise
Share
More from Peter Visclosky
I thank the chairwoman for yielding. I would like to begin by expressing my appreciation to Ranking Member Calvert. Mr. Calvert continues to be a tremendous partner in this process, and he is a joy to work with. I would also like to…
We can't afford to lose the strong cooperation we had with our neighbors in the south, and we must do all we can to continue this partnership.
I must also stress my concern that the administration has not demonstrated the same commitment when it comes to arms control.
Who makes a decision to dispose of property like that when you have a backlog for people who are working in the military who need housing that is affordable?
Other voices in this conversation
