Peter Visclosky: “I rise in opposition because of where the funds for the gentleman's amendment are coming from. The amendment would use…”

“I rise in opposition because of where the funds for the gentleman's amendment are coming from. The amendment would use funds from a committee priority, the Defense Rapid Innovation program. This program emphasizes technology development issues done primarily through small businesses. Certainly, in my short time as ranking member on this subcommittee, I have been impressed by the lack of a true small business program at the Department of Defense, despite their protestations. DOD's track record of support for small businesses must be improved for many reasons, not the least of which is what small businesses provide to solve major issues for the Department. In the 2 years of program execution so far, fiscal years 2011 and 2012, the Department of Defense has received over 3,000 proposals for funding. This includes 2,200 proposals from small businesses across America for fiscal year 2012 funding for completion and execution this year. Again, my concern is where the money is coming from in this amendment, and I strongly oppose the gentleman's amendment. I yield back the balance of my time.”