I would simply also state my objection to the gentleman's amendment. I appreciate the concerns he expressed, especially for those projects that may not make economic sense. If in those cases the gentleman is correct, there should be no loan guarantee offered. Having said that, for those programs that are in the queue that are under consideration that make sense and move our energy policy forward, we ought not to prohibit them from doing so by passing this amendment this evening. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Kucinich). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes appeared to have it.
Peter Visclosky: “I would simply also state my objection to the gentleman's amendment. I appreciate the concerns he expressed, especially…”
Share
More from Peter Visclosky
We will talk today about training, equipment, and resources needed to give our soldiers the skills and tools needed to accomplish their missions.
It does not contain verifiable metrics to ensure the Taliban is holding up their end of the bargain.
Before I begin with my remarks on the fiscal year (FY) 2021 bill, I would like to briefly discuss some concerns I have as a longtime member of the House Appropriations Committee. The Committee has a unique responsibility. It is charged…
Today, April 23, 2020, I missed roll call votes 103 and 104. Had I been present for roll call 103, on Agreeing to H. Res. 938, Providing for the adoption of the resolution (H. Res. 935) establishing a Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus…





