The proposed change inserts a new test for the certification of acquisition and is likely meant to make it more difficult for the NSA to target foreign nationals if the intended target is in communication with someone in the United States. I would point out, however, to the gentleman that this is an appropriations bill. This is not an authorization bill. The amendment is a serious change in policy and deserves more than 10 minutes of debate in this Chamber on our bill. The issue belongs in the authorizing committees. I do not believe that this amendment has benefited from the work of the authorization process, and I do believe it would potentially put American lives at greater risk. I reserve the balance of my time.
Peter Visclosky: “The proposed change inserts a new test for the certification of acquisition and is likely meant to make it more…”
On the recordJune 18, 2019
Share
More from Peter Visclosky
Jan 8, 2020
I deeply appreciate Mr. Rush yielding time to me. I also thank him for organizing this Special Order. I thank my colleague from Chicago, Mr. Davis, for participating, and earlier today, Andre Carson, a Member from Indianapolis, for also…
Feb 5, 2020
What assurance after 19 years of failure in our drawdown that they are going to be able to do this?
Jul 30, 2020
I appreciate the gentleman yielding, and I do appreciate the gentlewoman's concerns. Mr. Speaker, I would begin my remarks by saying the United States military is a very special place. Only about 30 percent of young Americans between 17…
Feb 5, 2020
We are keenly aware of the need to modernize the Army of today in order to meet potential great power competition in the future.





