Peter Visclosky: “I appreciate the recognition, Mr. Chairman, and I also rise in opposition to the gentleman's amendment. Our country…”

“I appreciate the recognition, Mr. Chairman, and I also rise in opposition to the gentleman's amendment. Our country really does need a diversified energy portfolio. Nuclear is part of that. Almost a quarter of all of our electrical power today is generated through nuclear power. It is carbon free, and I do not think this is the time to withdraw research support. In light of, particularly, the tragedy in Japan, the safety of our existing fleet and progress as far as improved technologies is vital. And, again, I would add my voice to that in opposition to the gentleman's amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California (Mr. McClintock). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes appeared to have it. Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California will be postponed. {time} 1420 The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will read.…”