If the F-35 is going to represent a sizeable portion of the Air Force, and we are going to spend money as far as if you would be matching up the gravity bomb and the F-35, it is a lot of money for another variant of a nuclear weapon on a plane that is going to see less and less use.
Peter Visclosky: “If the F-35 is going to represent a sizeable portion of the Air Force, and we are going to spend money as far as if you…”
Editor's note · Context
Visclosky questions the cost-effectiveness of integrating nuclear weapons with the F-35.
Share
More from Peter Visclosky
Today, April 23, 2020, I missed roll call votes 103 and 104. Had I been present for roll call 103, on Agreeing to H. Res. 938, Providing for the adoption of the resolution (H. Res. 935) establishing a Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus…
I have no further requests for time on our side, and I reserve the balance of my time.
I simply ask our colleagues to support the continuing resolution, and I, too, yield back the balance of my time.
I thank the chairwoman for yielding. I would like to begin by expressing my appreciation to Ranking Member Calvert. Mr. Calvert continues to be a tremendous partner in this process, and he is a joy to work with. I would also like to…





