We are about to mark up in the Committee on Government Reform a new defense procurement act, as is Armed Services; and I am trying to understand, again, as the Department of Defense came and talked with those of us on the committee last night, their argument was they are trying to reduce costs and get more flexibility in the Federal Government. Why would they then do something that costs more with less quality in another area? And how are they going to justify coming to Congress and asking us to vote for that acquisition act if they do not fix this?
Mark Souder: “We are about to mark up in the Committee on Government Reform a new defense procurement act, as is Armed Services; and I…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the Department of Defense's rationale for a new defense procurement act.
Share
More from Mark Souder
Let me first ask a quick question on the, separate from the structural problems, isn't it, as far as the deficit that you are running in the relationship to income and so one, hasn't it always been true in the Post Office that the money is…
the proposal to end the FFEL program and replace it with direct federal student lending will have negative consequences on students, it is fiscal madness and the alleged financial benefits to the federal government are likely illusionary.
I wanted to share a few thoughts. Many years ago, I was a student at Indiana Purdue University in Fort Wayne. I'm old now. But in the late 1960s and 1970s, prior to Roe v. Wade, many of us were concerned about the liberalization of…
it is important that in what is perceived as a little bit of a back-pedaling on focus on terrorism, that doesn't turn into wholesale retreat





