As much as I appreciate my friend from New Jersey's comments, in the committee we had a different amendment which said that nobody hired in the last 30 days before an election could vote, and then we wouldn't have had to be discriminatory. But, of course, that was defeated unanimously on the Democratic side. This amendment tries to address it in another way, because we weren't allowed to address it in the other way, and it was defeated. I support this because, in fact, people who aren't committed to the company come in for the sole purpose of unionizing, and we haven't been allowed to address it in any way.
Mark Souder: “As much as I appreciate my friend from New Jersey's comments, in the committee we had a different amendment which said…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to voting rights and unionization during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Mark Souder
The proposal to sharply expand the Pell Grant Program and make it an entitlement is likewise fiscally irresponsible and potentially might add to already inflated college costs.
At a time when California is begging on their knees, we are being held up as California a model of how they did low income and affordability in college.
The notion that federal financial aid has promoted college access to the United States is a myth not a reality.
The proposal to end the FFEL program and replace it with direct federal student lending will have negative consequences on students, it is fiscal madness and the alleged financial benefits to the federal government are likely illusionary.





