we were restricted to 50 seconds. Most people have gone through the process, but many Members did not come over who could have spoken. I have a general concern that the Appropriations Committee on all the amendments can gang up, as we saw here, on a 5-minute rule; and I have concern about these unanimous consent agreements. I do not think we need to hold the House further here. We already went through our different statements. I could debate for 30 minutes on the census and other things, but I think we should move to a vote at this point. But I have a real problem about this intimidation by the Appropriations Committee.
Mark Souder: “we were restricted to 50 seconds. Most people have gone through the process, but many Members did not come over who…”
On the recordJune 27, 2006
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Mark Souder
May 20, 2009
If there is a single republican who will take the word of the other party that says when there is a public and private offered that the intent isn't to drive out the private, look at this example, 74 percent of colleges chose the private.
Jan 21, 2009
I wanted to share a few thoughts. Many years ago, I was a student at Indiana Purdue University in Fort Wayne. I'm old now. But in the late 1960s and 1970s, prior to Roe v. Wade, many of us were concerned about the liberalization of…
May 20, 2009
the proposal to sharply expand the Pell Grant Program and make it an entitlement is likewise fiscally irresponsible and potentially might add to already inflated college costs.





