You would at least think they would come out and say they are sorry. "We're sorry that for 40 years we did this." Maybe it would take seven speechwriters to sort through this over time to get the "sorry" part down just right. But how you can come down here and not even say you are sorry and then point at us who have just gotten here, barely 4 years in control, have balanced the budget for the first time, have a surplus actually putting the money over in Social Security and then to point at us just takes an incredible amount. At the very least you should say you are sorry.
Mark Souder: “You would at least think they would come out and say they are sorry. "We're sorry that for 40 years we did this." Maybe…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the lack of accountability for past budgetary practices.
Share
More from Mark Souder
I support H.R. 5715, and voted for it when it was first considered on the House floor. Although I have some reservations, I believe it is a reasonable compromise that will provide the student loan market added flexibility and stability…
Let me first ask a quick question on the, separate from the structural problems, isn't it, as far as the deficit that you are running in the relationship to income and so one, hasn't it always been true in the Post Office that the money is…
It's based off the capital gains. Right now--I had one person with a $40,000 house, and the capital gains on that made the difference of his retirement on an annual basis. The question is they have planned nothing----
There is no 'we' here. Education starts with the parents and the local, moves up to the state.





