the gentleman is aware, as we debated a number of times, that there are multiple rulings if it is used to teach primarily sectarian doctrine. In other words, if you teach religious doctrine, the courts clearly ruled. However, if one is pervasively sectarian, but not teaching religious views, the court has ruled in other cases. That is why we said consistent with the establishment clause, because it could be challenged. The fact is, HUD currently gives and has given hundreds of these grants around the country to pervasively sectarian organizations.
Mark Souder: “the gentleman is aware, as we debated a number of times, that there are multiple rulings if it is used to teach…”
On the recordApril 6, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of court rulings on sectarian doctrine and HUD grants.
Share
More from Mark Souder
May 20, 2010
Well, I personally feel I should have probably abstained from the hearing.
Mar 9, 2010
SPC Nicholas Scott Hartge served in Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry, Brigade Combat Team, 1st Infantry Division in Schweinfurt, Germany. Nicholas grew up in the small town of Rome City, Indiana were he was deeply involved…
May 20, 2009
the proposal to end the FFEL program and replace it with direct federal student lending will have negative consequences on students, it is fiscal madness and the alleged financial benefits to the federal government are likely illusionary.





