we have heard a lot today and we will hear a lot more in the future about who is saving social security, but there is a key fact we should keep in mind. That is, for 40 years the Democrats held control of this House. The number of times they worked to save social security was somewhere around zero. The important thing here is not whether we talk, but whether we do. Today in the Committee on Education and the Workforce we are considering a bill called Ed-Flex, to give local and State governments more flexibility, and allowing school boards more flexibility in education. Similar bills are being considered on the Senate floor. We are actually doing something about what other people talk about. It is a bipartisan effort. The gentleman from Delaware (Mr. Castle), the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Roemer), and others from both sides of the aisle are reaching forth. Will the Democratic Party join with us in trying to give flexibility?
Mark Souder: “we have heard a lot today and we will hear a lot more in the future about who is saving social security, but there is a…”
On the recordMarch 3, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the Ed-Flex bill and the need for flexibility in education during a House floor speech.
Share
More from Mark Souder
Apr 28, 2009
I feel like I woke up in the morning, and missed the big meeting where the federal government was declared God.
May 20, 2009
the proposal to end the FFEL program and replace it with direct federal student lending will have negative consequences on students, it is fiscal madness and the alleged financial benefits to the federal government are likely illusionary.
Mar 20, 2010
The question is: Are our veterans covered in the Senate bill, and is TRICARE going to be gutted in the Senate bill? And the veterans who took this risk during the Cold War would rather--as much as they appreciate a flag being raised…





