Is it not true that this bill has historically, because it contains the salaries of Federal employees, the amendment to not have the pay raise, to eliminate the COLA is historically placed?
Mark Souder: “Is it not true that this bill has historically, because it contains the salaries of Federal employees, the amendment to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the historical context of a bill related to Federal employee salaries.
Share
More from Mark Souder
It's based off the capital gains. Right now--I had one person with a $40,000 house, and the capital gains on that made the difference of his retirement on an annual basis. The question is they have planned nothing----
How does the Administration plan to stem the need for drug treatment in the future by eliminating prevention efforts such as the State Grants portion of the Safe and Drug Free Schools and Communities (SDFSC) program?
The law of unintended consequences has led to outcomes far different than intended as Federal Student Assistance has expanded over time.
This is a pretty amazing hearing, the party of Andrew Jackson who opposed the national banks not only proposing another national bank.





