I want to make just two brief points. One is Vancouver, when they were first looking at it because of their at that time rising AIDS rates, which were not nearly as high at D.C., had a similar plan, or met with similar people from the medical community, and they've been proven wrong. Just because you have a plan and it came from the medical community does not mean it will work, and the program hasn't worked. But I do want to make, if I could, one personal clarification. I am more than willing and have worked to put this restriction on every city in America. I don't distinguish Washington, D.C., from others, and I don't appreciate the implication that I would treat it like a plantation. I believe this restriction ought to apply to every city.
Mark Souder: “I want to make just two brief points. One is Vancouver, when they were first looking at it because of their at that time…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the effectiveness of medical community plans in relation to AIDS rates and city restrictions.
Share
More from Mark Souder
the reason FEMA is in your agency isn't because of tornadoes and floods; it is there in case we have a catastrophe
the notion that federal financial aid has promoted college access to the United States is a myth not a reality.
the proposal to end the FFEL program and replace it with direct federal student lending will have negative consequences on students, it is fiscal madness and the alleged financial benefits to the federal government are likely illusionary.
If there is a single republican who will take the word of the other party that says when there is a public and private offered that the intent isn't to drive out the private, look at this example, 74 percent of colleges chose the private.





