I am aware that we have directly banned abortion funding, but the question and what we have tried to address and what this language tries to address is fungible funding. The argument of many of us is that in an organization that on the one hand does abortions, and on the other hand does family planning, which I as an individual do not oppose and believe many of these countries do in fact need family planning, that does not take life once life has begun, that these funds, even though they are claimed to be privately raised, are in fact fungible.
Mark Souder: “I am aware that we have directly banned abortion funding, but the question and what we have tried to address and what…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of fungible funding in relation to abortion and family planning.
Share
More from Mark Souder
The notion that federal financial aid has promoted college access to the United States is a myth not a reality.
If there is a single republican who will take the word of the other party that says when there is a public and private offered that the intent isn't to drive out the private, look at this example, 74 percent of colleges chose the private.
The proposal to end the FFEL program and replace it with direct federal student lending will have negative consequences on students, it is fiscal madness and the alleged financial benefits to the federal government are likely illusionary.
This is a pretty amazing hearing, the party of Andrew Jackson who opposed the national banks not only proposing another national bank.





