Today, we will be debating a bill that will go a long way in protecting the constitutional rights of the residents of the District of Columbia. As all may know, currently in Washington, D.C., citizens are prevented from owning any handgun at all. I am bringing before you today a bill that would restore the second amendment rights of D.C. citizens. I think it is important to note that my bill would not repeal any provision of D.C. law that bans gun possession by criminals, or that punishes violent crime. In 1976, 2 years after Congress had granted the District of Columbia home rule, the D.C. City Council passed a bill which repealed the handgun ban in the District. The handgun ban actually arrested progress. In the 5 years before 1976, when the handgun ban was put into effect, the murder rate in the District of Columbia had fallen to 27 per 100,000 from 37 per 100,000, according to researchers at the American Enterprise Institute. Five years after the ban, the murders had climbed back to 35 for every 100,000 residents. From that point, it became worse. In the 13 years between 1987 and 2000, D.C. earned the dubious distinction as the murder capital of the United States.
Mark Souder: “Today, we will be debating a bill that will go a long way in protecting the constitutional rights of the residents of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a bill to restore Second Amendment rights for D.C. residents.
Share
More from Mark Souder
it is important that in what is perceived as a little bit of a back-pedaling on focus on terrorism, that doesn't turn into wholesale retreat
the proposal to sharply expand the Pell Grant Program and make it an entitlement is likewise fiscally irresponsible and potentially might add to already inflated college costs.
the proposal to end the FFEL program and replace it with direct federal student lending will have negative consequences on students, it is fiscal madness and the alleged financial benefits to the federal government are likely illusionary.
Let me first ask a quick question on the, separate from the structural problems, isn't it, as far as the deficit that you are running in the relationship to income and so one, hasn't it always been true in the Post Office that the money is…





