Mr. Chairman, I am a cosponsor of H.R. 789, the Fairness in Music Licensing Act, which has bipartisan support of over 157 Members of Congress. While I wish that it were what he was offering today on the floor, I believe this compromised amendment by Mr. Sensenbrenner is fair and balanced. The Sensenbrenner amendment is balanced because it does several key things. One, it levels the playing field for businesses that use music. These business owners will now have a way to settle their disputes with music licensing societies without having to go to rate court in New York City. We have heard about different options under this but that is an important change. Two, it will allow businesses of a certain size, 3,500 square feet or less where the speakers are located, and that is important, because it isn't just a question of where the diners are sitting, it is a question of your storage, your kitchens, and receiving areas as well are located to be exempt from copyright royalties when they play TVs and radios, which is important to remember it is TV and radio music. If a business is over 3,500 square feet, it may be exempt if it plays only two TVs and has no more than six speakers. The Sensenbrenner amendment is fair because it does not change the law with respect to other kinds of music that a business may use. For example, a restaurant that has live music or plays CDs will not be covered by this Sensenbrenner exemption.
Mark Souder: “Mr. Chairman, I am a cosponsor of H.R. 789, the Fairness in Music Licensing Act, which has bipartisan support of over…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Fairness in Music Licensing Act and the Sensenbrenner amendment.
Share
More from Mark Souder
Actually my main subject I want to cover tonight is Israel, but I didn't want today to pass again without making comments about the health care bill, because clearly that is the number one subject on the minds of the people in Indiana as…
I wanted to share a few thoughts. Many years ago, I was a student at Indiana Purdue University in Fort Wayne. I'm old now. But in the late 1960s and 1970s, prior to Roe v. Wade, many of us were concerned about the liberalization of…
Thank you. I'm going to yield to the ranking member in a minute. I didn't want to repeat questions when I was over at Homeland Security earlier.
This is a pretty amazing hearing, the party of Andrew Jackson who opposed the national banks not only proposing another national bank.





