We have a budget agreement that the President says he supports, that all of us in Congress say we support, that calls for very difficult appropriations levels, and quite bluntly, none of us are really happy with it. We want to keep the budget caps. We are trying to stay with the budget agreement. We all go out home and say we want to save all this money for social security. But when it comes to each bill, it is always, well, we really need this, we really need that. We have been trying to save a little bit of money in each one because a number of us strongly felt that while everybody talks about the need to stay within the budget agreement, the fact is that the money we had on the table for Labor-HHS, for Interior and Veterans, was not sufficient, and that every side was kind of doing a wink-wink and saying, well, we are trying to try to stay within the caps and within the budget agreement, knowing we were not working towards that.
Mark Souder: “We have a budget agreement that the President says he supports, that all of us in Congress say we support, that calls…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the challenges of adhering to budget agreements during appropriations discussions.
Share
More from Mark Souder
This is a pretty amazing hearing, the party of Andrew Jackson who opposed the national banks not only proposing another national bank.
Veterans get ping-ponged back and forth. Right now in Indiana, we're online in this budget to get a new hospital in Fort Wayne. We haven't had investment since before World War II. But they get ping-ponged down to Indianapolis because of…
the reason FEMA is in your agency isn't because of tornadoes and floods; it is there in case we have a catastrophe
At a time when California is begging on their knees, we are being held up as California a model of how they did low income and affordability in college.





