the gentleman, who is a member of the full committee and a very strong advocate of the CAP, has discussed this amendment with us. In examining his recommendations, on a number of these we completely agree. How we missed them, I do not know. As an example, the siphons. The siphons are in litigation, have been for quite some time. And some of the repairs, I understand, have been made. But there are still some that have not been made subject to whatever the decision will be by the court. But a number of others are legitimate and ways to save money. Anytime this committee can find a way to save money, and it is unanimous from the gentleman's delegation from Arizona, we have no objections. We welcome it, and I thank the gentleman.
John Myers: “the gentleman, who is a member of the full committee and a very strong advocate of the CAP, has discussed this amendment…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to cost-saving measures in a committee.
Share
More from John Myers
in the wee hours of this morning as we were finding a way to adjourn and come back this morning, one in our midst passed over the big 65. He joined the Medicare-eligible society that several of us have already joined. If it were possible…
Mr. Chairman, the arguments used against this project have been used many times. They were used in litigation in at least two court cases that I am aware of. Mr. Bevill and I and Mr. Fazio have been on this committee for a good many years…
It is my understanding that because the project has already been authorized by the Corps, all that is necessary is a narrowly refocused reevaluation study to determine the economic viability at this time, and the $150,000 appropriation can…
I rise this afternoon with sorrow to announce the passing of a former Member of Congress and a good friend of many of us, Richard L. Roudebush. Dick was a veteran of World War II. In 1953, Mr. Speaker, he was elected the State VFW…





