The gentleman, who is a member of the full committee and a very strong advocate of the CAP, has discussed this amendment with us. In examining his recommendations, on a number of these we completely agree. How we missed them, I do not know. As an example, the siphons. The siphons are in litigation, have been for quite some time. And some of the repairs, I understand, have been made. But there are still some that have not been made subject to whatever the decision will be by the court. But a number of others are legitimate and ways to save money. Anytime this committee can find a way to save money, and it is unanimous from the gentleman's delegation from Arizona, we have no objections. We welcome it, and I thank the gentleman.
John Myers: “The gentleman, who is a member of the full committee and a very strong advocate of the CAP, has discussed this amendment…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to cost-saving measures in a committee.
Share
More from John Myers
I do. If the gentleman would go over to page 124, the committee has recognized those programs and agencies that are not authorized by law. You will find, pursuant to clause 3 of rule XXI of the House of Representatives, the following table…
Of course, the committee is always willing to look at additional funds if we can find them, Mr. Chairman. Unfortunately, we were not able to find them before we came to the floor today. But when we do go to conference with the other body…
The New River is becoming more and more polluted. We understand there is a threat from Mexico. I think it meets the requirements to clean it up. They are going to shut some of our water off, and that will present a worse problem. We are…
The gentleman is correct. If he will read the report language, we very specifically said this is to be provided completely with Federal funds from the taxpayers.





