There is truly historic reform in this bill. The chairman of the committee, Mr. Roberts, has succeeded in forming a system that will let the American farmer make his planting decisions based on the market and not on some convoluted formula hatched in a USDA basement office. This bill also recognizes the danger of making this transition too drastically and thus is patterned to let the producer make the switch in a responsible manner. So as a reformer, I support the bill and oppose this amendment. This amendment is about the status quo--and the status quo has done nothing but handcuff the American farmer in terms of the world market and in terms of running a sound business. I urge a no vote on the amendment and a yes vote on the Agricultural Market Transition Act.
John Hostettler: “There is truly historic reform in this bill. The chairman of the committee, Mr. Roberts, has succeeded in forming a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Agricultural Market Transition Act and opposing an amendment during floor debate.
Share
More from John Hostettler
First of all, Mr. Jefferson was in France during the approval process of the Bill of Rights.
And I can understand that concern, but let me remind you that the awards act came in 1976. In 1962, the United States Supreme Court struck down the notion of school prayer without the attorneys fees award act. In 1963, the Supreme Court…
He was not in France during the ratification by the States of the Bill of Rights, but he was in France during the approval by the Congress of the Bill of Rights, which took place 2 years prior.
And that is perfect, so the gentleman can support my bill. I appreciate that, which is why it does something very important, which is why the gentleman and his cohorts are opposing the bill, because they understand that by removing the…





