this amendment is simple, straightforward, and necessary for the NLRB, the National Labor Relations Board, to do its job. The National Labor Relations Board currently has jurisdiction over many labor disputes that involve enterprises that impact interstate commerce. The board has traditionally addressed cases that substantially affect interstate commerce. In 1959, Congress endorsed this notion and enacted legislation known as the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act. Congress essentially gave discretion to the NLRB to decline cases where its jurisdiction was not warranted. However, this law did provide thresholds whereby the Board could not decline to assert its jurisdiction. These standards were based on raw dollar amounts and are based, for the most part, on the gross annual receipts of a business entity. Quite simply, the level at which the NLRB's jurisdiction over businesses kicks in is based on a business' economic activity and the thresholds vary depending upon the nature of the business. The reason for my amendment is that most of these thresholds have not been modified since the law was enacted in 1959. Clearly, the legislative method for determining jurisdiction is outdated and therefore overly burdensome to many small businesses that should never have been affected. My amendment merely indexes these thresholds for inflation.
John Hostettler: “this amendment is simple, straightforward, and necessary for the NLRB, the National Labor Relations Board, to do its…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to update jurisdiction thresholds for the National Labor Relations Board.
Share
More from John Hostettler
And I can understand that concern, but let me remind you that the awards act came in 1976. In 1962, the United States Supreme Court struck down the notion of school prayer without the attorneys fees award act. In 1963, the Supreme Court…
I would simply call to point that this is a very passionate debate that has taken place tonight, and that is exactly what the framers of the Constitution intended to happen. They intended to have passionate debate on issues relating to…
Though they represent different law enforcement agencies, these officers all have one thing in common, they all carry guns. So why is it that residents of Washington, D.C. are forbidden from protecting their families in this same fashion…
while I am not an attorney, it is my understanding that the perfect defense for a charge of libel is the truth. We have heard no discussions today about the substance of the descriptions in the committee report, and that is because the…





