Frankly, the arguments from my colleagues who oppose this amendment simply don't add up. By busting the budget caps, the nondefense programs that they are so passionately defending would face $55 billion in automatic cuts. So it seems my colleagues are willing to allow reductions in nondefense spending if they can also force reckless defense cuts that endanger national security. While that may be acceptable to those on the other side of the aisle, it is not acceptable to me. My amendment will bring spending in this division to the level needed to avoid sequestration and to protect our national security. Mr. Chairman, when I ran for this position, I promised my constituents that I would do my part to rein in Washington's spending addiction and safeguard the strength of the American military. Mr. Chair, I am proud that this amendment accomplishes both of those goals. I strongly urge my colleagues to support it. Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time. Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chair, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Joyce), the ranking member of the subcommittee.
Jim Banks: “Frankly, the arguments from my colleagues who oppose this amendment simply don't add up. By busting the budget caps, the…”
On the recordJune 20, 2019
Share
More from Jim Banks
Feb 26, 2026
before we leave for the weekend, I wanted to take a moment and just come down to the floor and give the President a lot of credit for a great State of the Union speech on Tuesday night. It was my eighth State of the Union speech. I spent 8…
Aug 22, 2026
If we legislate it and give Congress power to determine when TPS is appropriate when it's not, then we'll be able to address these issues long after President Trump leaves the White House.
Aug 22, 2026
I cannot believe that the Democrats are so radical and extreme today that they're OK with what's happened to our country [with] illegals taking jobs for Americans or allowing illegals to be behind the wheel of semi-trucks.





