after hearing the last remarks, the most scary scenario of all would be for us to continue to run this country into bankruptcy and then there are no programs that are going to get the benefit. Mr. Chairman, last November the American taxpayers declared that enough is enough. They are fed up with the Federal Government's liberal tax-and-spend policy. Passing the tax limitation balanced budget amendment will insure that the Government will balance its budget without raising taxes. The three-fifths rule serves as a vital disciplinary tool. It will help Congress resist the temptation to fall back into the liberal tax-and-spend habit of the past 30 years. It will keep Congress' sticky fingers out of the American taxpayer's back pocket. Are not American people already being taxed enough? Forty-nine States operate with a balanced budget amendment. Every American working family must balance their checkbook each month. Is it not time for the Federal Government to start living within its means as well? I urge all my colleagues to vote in favor of the Barton amendment.
Jasper Packard: “after hearing the last remarks, the most scary scenario of all would be for us to continue to run this country into…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for a balanced budget amendment during a House debate.
Share
More from Jasper Packard
I rise in support in H.R. 833, the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1999. It is time we revitalize our weak bankruptcy system, which is supposed to benefit those who need it most. As the sponsor of bankruptcy reform legislation during the 105th…
critics of the Marriage Tax Penalty Relief Act are calling it irresponsible. I rise today to offer what I believe is truly irresponsible. Mr. Speaker, the past thirty years of taxing hard-working married couples is irresponsible…
not thinking that there would be sufficient time, I have already submitted my statement for the Record, but I would like to simply say that it is refreshing to have a bipartisan across-the-board support of this resolution that calls for us…
I simply have to oppose this amendment because it totally eliminates the Nuclear Energy Research Initiative, which I think would be a terrible mistake. This has been an initiative very modestly funded while essential to keep nuclear energy…





