Government imposed regulations chip away at the very cornerstone of our society--private property. It is time to stop Government's encroachment on our fifth amendment rights. Overzealous Federal regulations intrude on property owner rights and restrict individual freedom. Government exists to protect and serve the needs of private property owners, not to trespass on them. H.R. 925, the Private Property Protection Act works to restore the sanctity of private property by ensuring fair compensation for unfair Federal takings. Our Republican property rights proposal represents a simple but constitutionally protected concept. Whether the Government wants your property to build a road or to preserve an endangered rat's habitat, the intent of our Founding Fathers is clear. If you take it, pay for it. H.R. 925 provides landowners with their first line of defense against overreaching Government regulations. Our Nation's greatness arises in large part from the opportunities afforded by the use and ownership of private property. The restrictions imposed by overzealous regulatory agencies and legislatures limits the ability of property owners to manage and use their land. Bureaucrats abrogating our property rights and abusing the fifth amendment, assault the very fabric of our society. Mr. Chairman, Government should be encouraging, not discouraging ownership of private property.
Jasper Packard: “Government imposed regulations chip away at the very cornerstone of our society--private property. It is time to stop…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of government regulations on private property rights.
Share
More from Jasper Packard
Should the committee receive a revised 302(b) allocation which increases our funding level, then our effort will be to consider increasing funding for the ARC to at least the fiscal year 2000 funding level.
I would like to stand in support of H.J. Res. 37, which will make it more difficult to raise taxes. It is time Congress puts a stop to the raid on the pocket books of American citizens. H.J. Res. 37 will require a two-thirds supermajority…
Funding should not be withheld, and this project should not be delayed. Issues raised by the opponents to the project have been adequately addressed during the planning stages and appropriate analyses and project modifications have been…
I reluctantly resist and oppose the amendment of my dear friend and colleague, the gentleman from California (Mr. Radanovich). But I am convinced that, if we allow the section 907 to continue, that it will prevent us from working toward a…





