I want to correct, what I hope is a misunderstanding. We have never had in this bill funding for the Northeast energy oil problem. That funding is in the Subcommittee on Interior, not in this bill. So we not only did not knock it out, it never was in this bill. There was an amendment passed on the floor of the House to do something in this area, but that jurisdiction really belongs in the Committee on Interior and not in this committee. This is to further clarify this whole issue. The House did pass a separate freestanding bill, the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, and that would have dealt with the Northeast oil issue, but that bill is being held up in the Senate by Senator Boxer. And for that reason, it has not moved. It is on hold by the Senator. The administration claims, however, that as long as the appropriations exist, they do not need legislation to release oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. In fact, the President announced last Friday that he was releasing 30 million barrels from that reserve. Clearly, he does not feel that legislation is necessary for this purpose. Madam Speaker, I do not agree with him, and frankly I do not think that is a wise policy, but the fact is that is what he announced.
Jasper Packard: “I want to correct, what I hope is a misunderstanding. We have never had in this bill funding for the Northeast energy…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the Northeast home heating oil reserve and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
Share
More from Jasper Packard
Today we will vote for 1-percent across-the-board savings in the budget by targeting waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal bureaucracy--not from critical services like Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid. I strongly urge my colleagues…
I rise today to commend a fellow San Diegan, Congressman Brian Bilbray (R-CA), on his leadership in helping to reduce air pollution in southern California. Mr. Bilbray's legislation, The Border Smog Reduction Act of 98, H.R. 8, is a…
I reluctantly resist and oppose the amendment of my dear friend and colleague, the gentleman from California (Mr. Radanovich). But I am convinced that, if we allow the section 907 to continue, that it will prevent us from working toward a…
I simply have to oppose this amendment because it totally eliminates the Nuclear Energy Research Initiative, which I think would be a terrible mistake. This has been an initiative very modestly funded while essential to keep nuclear energy…





