The Pentagon simply failed to anticipate the magnitude of the challenge that we face there.

What exactly does that mean? How do you have control over a facility but not the people who are running it?

Would it serve to demonstrate how seriously we take this situation and therefore a help to undo some of the damage to our reputation if you were to step down?

I think they had a sort of a visceral reaction. Well, if the Clinton people are saying it's important it must not be that important and we're going to focus on other things.

That's entirely up to our nominee.

I'm flattered you're asked, but that's entirely up to our nominee.

I would like to thank Chairman Shelby and Senator Sarbanes for holding today's hearing.

The effectiveness of this system is going to affect our diplomacy, other possible military actions, and so forth.

There are 10 going on line in 2004, 10 in 2005?

I would be interested in Senator Levin's reaction to this, if he has a moment to think about it.

Secretary Rumsfeld, I have supported your goal for a new round of base closures in 2005 and applaud your efforts to bring our military force in line with our infrastructure.