this is -- I want to raise an alarm here that we have been attacked. This is a really serious problem.

Absolutely.

It is on the table.

The President has put forward what I would consider a red line, in terms of U.S. policy.

The impacts of the long-term trends towards a warming climate, more air pollution, biodiversity loss, and water scarcity are likely to fuel economic and social discontent--and possibly upheaval--through 2018.

We should do a significant review of the current CFIUS situation to bring it up to speed.

They endanger the men and women of the intelligence community, the armed services and those who serve overseas. They give our adversaries knowledge of our activities.

I would make every effort to try to find out why we were not able to come to a specific number of collection on U.S. persons.

The purpose of the authority is to give the United States intelligence community the upper hand in trying to avert these types of attacks before they transpire.

We are working to produce a relevant metric.

I have never been pressured, I've never felt pressure to intervene or interfere in any way with shaping intelligence.