I would like to respond, also, to the Senator from California, who indicated that one of the reasons why she opposes the Coats amendment is that we will not have medical personnel adequately trained to perform abortions if necessary. I would like to state for the record that an ACGME member--the certifying body--ACGME member submitted testimony to the Senate Labor and Human Resources Committee that the D&C procedures that are taught to every ob-gyn and procedures used in cases of miscarriages and those of induced abortion require similar experience. Numerous ob-gyn's have indicated to us--and I have a pile of letters here from them, indicating so, and I will be happy to submit those for the Record--that an OB-GYN who is trained, as they must be trained, to perform D&C procedures in the case of spontaneous abortions, are more than adequately prepared, should the need arise, to perform an induced abortion. In short, a resident needs not to have performed an abortion on a live, unborn child, to have mastered the procedure to protect the health of the mother if necessary.
Dan Coats: “I would like to respond, also, to the Senator from California, who indicated that one of the reasons why she opposes the…”
On the recordMarch 19, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Responding to concerns about medical training related to abortion procedures during Senate debate.
Share
More from Dan Coats
Jul 18, 2018
I don't know what happened in that meeting. I think as time goes by and the president has already mentioned some things that happened in that meeting, I think we will learn more. But that is the president's prerogative. If he had asked me…
Apr 8, 2019
increasing the risk of social unrest, migration, and interstate tension in countries such as Egypt, Ethiopia, Iraq, and Jordan.
Aug 10, 2020
I can confirm that one of my staffers who was aware of the controversy requested that I modify that assessment, but I said no. No, we need to stick to what the analysts have said.





