I strongly support an initiative to establish a Quadrennial Intelligence Review and an independent, nonpartisan National Intelligence Panel. This process can be modeled after the Military Force Structure Review Act of 1986 which passed the Senate by a unanimous vote of 100-0. This Act directed the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) and the National Defense Panel (NDP) which conducted comprehensive reviews of all aspects of defense. These reviews have produced a much needed update of our defense strategy, a revised defense program, and a vibrant debate on the course of our defense capabilities. I believe that a process of internal and external comprehensive review fashioned on this QDR and NDP model can be equally effective in the area of intelligence. I intend to work with the Committee to develop a provision establishing a Quadrennial Intelligence Review and an independent National Intelligence Panel for inclusion in the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999.
Dan Coats: “I strongly support an initiative to establish a Quadrennial Intelligence Review and an independent, nonpartisan National…”
Editor's note · Context
Advocating for the establishment of a Quadrennial Intelligence Review and National Intelligence Panel.
Share
More from Dan Coats
Woodward writes that Dan Coats continued to harbor the secret belief, one that had grown rather than lessened, although unsupported by intelligence proof that Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, had something on Trump.
I don't know what happened in that meeting. I think as time goes by and the president has already mentioned some things that happened in that meeting, I think we will learn more. But that is the president's prerogative. If he had asked me…
We currently assess that North Korea will seek to retain its WMD capabilities and is unlikely to completely give up its nuclear weapons and production capabilities because its leaders ultimately view nuclear weapons as critical to regime…





