That is my last word here. I know that the Senator is very familiar with what the State of Oregon has done. The constituents of Oregon have elected him because they feel he knows what is going on in that State. It does not sound to me as if the Senator from Oregon knows what the State of Indiana has done. They elected this Senator because they know I know what is going on in that State. So I think it is presumptuous for the Senator from Oregon to say what Indiana has done is incorrect when he does not even know what it is. All I am saying is I want to protect Indiana's right to make a determination of what is in the best interests of their citizens, and the Senator has answered my question. He preempts that part of our law which does not conform to what he thinks is right, but obviously it has to reflect what we in Indiana think is right. So I thank the Senator for his responses.
Dan Coats: “That is my last word here. I know that the Senator is very familiar with what the State of Oregon has done. The…”
Editor's note · Context
Defending Indiana's rights in response to comments from the Senator from Oregon.
Share
More from Dan Coats
We expect our adversaries and our strategic competitors to refine their capabilities and add new tactics as they learn from each other's experiences, suggesting the threat landscape could look very different in 2020 and future elections.
I know others have talked about that here today, but when you and I had a chance to talk earlier in the last couple weeks, I mentioned one of my real concerns about China.
likely to fuel competition for resources, economic distress, and social discontent through 2019 and beyond.
I'm here to say the warning lights are blinking red again. Today, the digital infrastructure that serves this country is literally under attack.





