The Air Force has specified in testimony before us and in a public statement that they believe, with the adjustments that Senator Cohen has made and the QDR has made in terms of the total number of planes to be built, they can meet the cost projection. It makes a great deal of sense, I think, for the Congress to say we encourage you very, very strongly--in fact, we will put language in to give that encouragement-- to meet that cost. If we are going to have a viable tactical modernization program in the future, given the realities of the budget that we have to deal with our entire defense structure, we have to set realistic cost caps on how much we will spend. If we don't do that, we will run into problems that we have run into before, as in B-2 and other modernization programs, and we jeopardize the entire tactical air modernization program as well as funding for other aspects of our national security. I think this makes perfect sense because we have something here that simply ratifies what the Air Force has said they can already do.
Dan Coats: “The Air Force has specified in testimony before us and in a public statement that they believe, with the adjustments…”
On the recordJuly 11, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the Air Force's cost projections and tactical modernization program.
Share
More from Dan Coats
Apr 8, 2019
substantial damages to the United States economy, environment, and human health and well-being over the coming decades.
Jan 18, 2021
I know others have talked about that here today, but when you and I had a chance to talk earlier in the last couple weeks, I mentioned one of my real concerns about China.
Jul 18, 2018
I don't know what happened in that meeting. I think as time goes by and the president has already mentioned some things that happened in that meeting, I think we will learn more. But that is the president's prerogative. If he had asked me…





