So I still do not understand, and maybe the gentleman can explain it to me, because he is pretty learned on this, since he has been working on this a long time, the two main arguments were that people could be hurt, and there is no evidence of that; and, second, that we might be getting counterfeit products that are inferior, and the gentleman has proven that that can be overcome. So what is the argument the FDA is using beyond those two?
Questioning the FDA's arguments regarding safety and counterfeit products.
Share
More from Dan Burton
Our colleague from Ohio was talking about these leases. And the reason they want to drill in ANWR is because geologists found there is a huge supply of oil there. That makes your point. That's where the oil is. As Willy said, that's where…
Mercury is toxic to the human brain. And neurological problems have been caused by mercury and mercury should not be in vaccines.
Today we passed the largest spending bill in the history of the United States. When you add the interest and everything into it, it is going to cost over $1 trillion. I don't think the American people really understand how much $1 trillion…
I just want to follow up the train of thought that you have. These taxes that they want to put on Big Oil, if there are excessive profits made and there is collusion or something like that, if there is criminal behavior, obviously…
Other voices in this conversation
