On the record
The possibility of its being abused is urged as an argument against its expediency"; but, said Marshall, such arguments would prevent all government and result in anarchy.
Source
gutenberg.orgAlbert Beveridge: “The possibility of its being abused is urged as an argument against its expediency"; but, said Marshall, such arguments…”
Editor's note · Context
Beveridge argues that fears of government abuse should not prevent the establishment of governance, as it could lead to chaos.
Share
More from Albert Beveridge
In the development of John Marshall as well as of his great ultimate antagonist, Thomas Jefferson, during the formative decade which we are now to consider, the influence of the French Revolution must never be forgotten.
Thus were the ideas of Nationality and localism in America brought into sharper conflict by the mob and guillotine in France.
Such attempts ought to be repelled with a decision which shall convince France and the world that we are not a degraded people, humiliated under a colonial spirit of fear and sense of inferiority, fitted to be the miserable instruments of …
But an act universally recognized as criminal, such as robbery, murder, and the like, "is an offense against the community of nations.
Other voices in this conversation
