It is designed so that Members of the Senate who under pressure from the administration or because of persuasion from Senator Byrd or whatever other reason, they want to vote against Senate Joint Resolution 41, the real thing, but they want to go back home and say, ``I voted for a constitutional amendment for a balanced budget.'' And so this gives them a way to cover themselves. If there was any real desire on the part of the majority leader or anyone to pass this, there would not have been a suggestion that we have to have 67 votes to adopt this amendment. I can never remember in now my 19th year in Congress anyone ever suggesting for any amendment you have to have 67 votes to pass it. The proponents would not have suggested that if they believed it was desirable to pass it.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the motivations behind Senate Joint Resolution 41 and the requirement for 67 votes.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
we are all heavily dependent on our staffs and the support people around here. We are dependent on the pages and the people who take down our words and the people who tell us what is pending, the people who guard this establishment and the…
what this amendment proposes is very simple: That we appoint a three-member privacy commission with no more than 25 employees, $1.5 million authorization the first year that would take a look at the whole question of privacy in our…
I would point out simply that is the policy of this administration as spelled out in the Wellstone amendment. That is why I am hoping that maybe we can still work out some kind of a compromise with the Senator from Kansas because I do not…
It ought to be a very rare thing. We can't just be an international Rambo wandering around doing whatever we want regardless of international law.





