I heard Senator Brown the other day say if this does not pass, then we will, before the decade is out as the situation gets more extreme, pass a more extreme constitutional amendment. I think that is the reality. As my colleague from Utah knows, I resisted attempts to put some language in here that is frankly much tougher than this. I think this is constitutional in nature. I think it will do the job. But I think it is designed in such a way that it will help the country and not harm the country.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the implications of a constitutional amendment and its potential impact on the country.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
what this amendment proposes is very simple: That we appoint a three-member privacy commission with no more than 25 employees, $1.5 million authorization the first year that would take a look at the whole question of privacy in our…
You face a much harsher judge . . . than this committee and that is the judgment of history.
I rise today to recognize a special milestone in science and our understanding of nature. Scientists at Illinois' own Fermilab have found the first direct evidence of the top quark, the sixth and last component of a standard model of…
You face a much harsher judge than this Committee, and that is the judgment of history, and that judgment is likely to revolve around the question, did you restrict freedom or did you expand it.





