I concur completely with what my colleague from Massachusetts has to say. Under the amendment by the Senator from Kansas, this would be a 3-year authorization. And it really, you know, takes a little while to get a program up and going. Secretary Riley and Secretary Reich are eager on this, so I think this one is going to move fairly quickly. If this were a cutting back from 8 years to 6 years, something like that, I think that could be considered. And I have spoken to my colleague from Massachusetts about that. But a 3-year authorization, I do not think is realistic. I would be happy to join the Senator from Kansas at any point she wants to hold a hearing to see how the thing is going. Let us review it. It does not need just to be the Appropriations Committee that takes a look at this. But I think we have to have more than a 3-year authorization.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the need for a longer authorization period for a program.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
First, I want to comment on the observations of the majority leader, for whom I have great respect, when he said we are putting this off to the year 2001 so no one here will have to act on it. Senator Feinstein was one of those who talked…
I am pleased to submit this resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the recent tragic events in Rwanda. I am joined in this effort by Senators Jeffords, Kassebaum, Kennedy, Feingold, Wofford, and Pell. On April 6, 1994…
Today we reflect on one of the worst crimes against humanity committed in our century: the Turkish massacre of 1/2 million Armenians beginning in 1915. Nationalism based on notions of ethnic purity is not something most Americans…
Absolutely not. And the argument that we are taking away Presidential prerogative is not valid. The President has the obligation to submit a balanced budget. But the President may very well say, because of circumstances, we are in a…





